Jan 24, 2017

Call me crazy, but I wanna f--- Kellyanne Conway.

 

Jan 24, 2017

 

Jan 24, 2017

saw something that supposedly said the EPA's funding has also been frozen, or some isht like that

 

Jan 24, 2017

I might fly over to america and try get a job working on building the wall. Would be great to feel apart of something so historic, like building the great wall of china, but not being a slave forced into labor that dies and is cemented into the wall.

 

Jan 24, 2017

I'm going to say this and I'm going to say it again. #StillWithBernie... I connected with him almost instantly due to his politics, radical changes and forward thinking attitude. If anything, it shows that the DNC is a terrible party that relies on alt-comedy and media ties in order to present their image. In fact, it makes the Hollywood industry and entertainment look like a shrilling contest.

 

Jan 24, 2017

Yup. He also basically threatened martial law in Chicago on twitter. Can you imagine the s--- fest that could possibly turn into? Ferguson 2.0? I also love how conservatives screamed about Obama making the U.S. a police state when that's exactly what Trump is doing.

 

Jan 24, 2017

Bernie Sanders is terrible and would have gotten destroyed by Trump...his supporters never saw him get challenged on anything because of how weak Hilary was in debating him (probably because she knew that she already had the nomination in the bag)

 

Jan 24, 2017

i dont think bernie wanted a win to begin with, just some $$ for a new car

 

Jan 25, 2017

So Trump ordered an investigation into mass voter fraud today even though it's been clear that mass voter fraud is all but nonexistent in the U.S. There goes our tax dollars.... being spent in effort to solidify Trump's ego.

 

Jan 25, 2017

*in the voice of a person who gets paid to be on The O'Reilly Factor* this post is why Trump won

 

Jan 25, 2017

Why is abortion conflated with birth control?
Do the republicans have some ban on condoms?

 

Jan 25, 2017

You have to recognize the voter base republicans have. A high percentage of them are religious (evangelical Christians) who view any type of birth control whether it be the pill or abortion as immoral. So they have to match the views of their constituentency in order to secure re-election. Also, Republicans are extremely pro life as I'm sure you know. To them, any organization conducting abortions should not be federally funded (even though federal dollars can not be used toward abortion procedures according to federal law) even if those organizations provide numerous other healthcare services. Look at planned parenthood for example: just 3% of their services are abortions yet republicans in congress have been fighting to defund it for YEARS.

 

Jan 25, 2017

This thread has turned into several pages of liberals just complaining to each other lol

 

Jan 25, 2017

Our president is entertaining conspiracy theories bruh. Should we not complain?

 

Jan 26, 2017

I know I said I was done here as soon as the election was settled, but I wouldn’t miss this thread for the world. The reactions were sure to be priceless, and lo and behold, it’s a gushing fountain of juicy liberal tears! As such the hue and cry over the new administration is mostly emotion and no substance, as is typical of leftist behavior. This might be seen as little more than flaying a dead horse on my part, but sad to say the flaying is necessary, because the horse is not dead. But to deal with each and every moron in this thread would be a fool’s errand, so I’ll just single out a couple of my favorites for old time’s sake, and then be on my merry way.

Says who? CNN, 538 and all the other fake news orginizations that have been telling you for almost a year and half that Trump could never win? No, my little amigo, it hasn’t been ‘clear’ at all. Some political scientists maintain that mass voter fraud does in fact exist, such as Jesse Richman and David Earnest, who estimate up to nearly 3 million non-citizens voted in ‘08.

“In spite of substantial public controversy, very little reliable data exists concerning the frequency with which non-citizen immigrants participate in United States elections. Although such participation is a violation of election laws in most parts of the United States, enforcement depends principally on disclosure of citizenship status at the time of voter registration. This study examines participation rates by non-citizens using a nationally representative sample that includes non-citizen immigrants. We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.”

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414000973

Study (PDF):
http://www6.zippyshare.com/v/oPxaKsbd/file.html

This is a painfully stupid post. Not one cogent point. Your candidate of choice was perhaps the most lawless politician ever to seek the presidency, yet you haven’t mentioned one thing even approaching a criminal act committed by Donald Trump, because he hasn’t broken any laws. And spare me the “he admitted to sexual assault!” drivel; you know very well that logic doesn’t hold.

It’s amusing that you find his threatening to prosecute Hillary Clinton to be so egregious an offense that it was the first of supposedly numerous to come to mind, despite:

• highly credible charges of unprecedented corruption involving hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation from donors, many of them foreign entities, while she was Secretary of State, as well as outrageous speaking fees for Bill Clinton from these same donors (importantly, his speaking fees skyrocketed after Hillary became Secretary of State);

• violation of an agreement between Clinton and the Obama Administration not to accept foreign donations during her tenure as Secretary of State;

• the destruction via BleachBit (a program designed to make the information non-retrievable) of likely incriminating emails after a subpoena;

• being cleared of criminal conduct by the FBI that would have sent ordinary people to prison;

• her staff pleading the Fifth Amendment in Congressional hearings;

• many of her staff receiving immunity deals even there is good reason to think they lied to the FBI;

• an agreement for the FBI to destroy computer owned by Clinton aides, including Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s Chief of Staff, plus looking only at contents between June 1, 2014 and February 1, 2015 and hence ignoring much possibly incriminating evidence.

http://www.vdare.com/articles/clare...ill-be-nostalgic-for-donald-trumps-moderation

All this and yet Trump was gracious enough to pardon her. But oh, no, you’ll never give him credit for that. Instead you fault the man for wanting to bring a known criminal to justice. Oy vey.

 

Jan 26, 2017

https://www.google.com/amp/www.lati...ection-20141031-column,amp.html?client=safari

 

Jan 26, 2017

The Daily Caller Hot Air got any Breitbart for us? Perhaps some InfoWars!

You want me to give credit to Trump for pardoning Clinton - a thing that hasn't happened?

Predictably, your post devolved into a series of "Hillary Clinton is bad!" memes - many of which prove nothing about Hillary Clinton's badness (her staff received immunity deals? Some people pleaded the 5th? And? Are you even remotely familiar with these sorts of investigations? Probably not, so I'll help you out here: there is literally nothing surprising or strange about those things). You can't defend Trump because he's indefensible. All you've got is "he hasn't broken any laws!" which.............let's just say that's a shaky assertion, to say the least.

And the fact that you have the balls to zero in on Clinton taking foreign donations as SOS. I mean...do you really have no self-awareness whatsoever? Trump is in violation of the emoluments clause...right now. Today.

Btw, you said everything I said was incorrect/without merit - I'll skip the sexual assault stuff for now, it's low hanging fruit. What is incorrect about pointing out that Trump pushed baseless conspiracy theories about Barack Obama and Ted Cruz's father? Insane conspiracy theories with zero evidence? You'd have to be either an absolute moron or a bad person to push these ideas, both of which are indisputably factually untrue. And you'd have to be nearly as bad to defend them. Try it, please.

 

Jan 26, 2017

That ABC interview was cringeworthy. Nice to see somebody sat Trump down and explained that he needed to turn the crowd size obsession into a defense of his base though. That was a decent spin.

 

Jan 26, 2017

So the entire state department's senior management team just resigned. These four officials have served under both democratic and republican presidents so it wasn't a partisan issue. People jumping ship and want nothing to do with the Trump administration.

 

Jan 26, 2017

ahyuck