Kendrick Lamar Post about Kendrick on the site page is bs..

Started by TheLegend, Jan 28, 2016, in Kendrick Lamar Add to Reading List

  1. TheLegend
    Posts: 22
    Likes: 8
    Joined: Mar 13, 2015
    Location: Charlotte, NC

    Jan 28, 2016
    It's almost like the author is trying to make you feel guilty if you don't share his sentiments..

    1st off..Kendrick's first show endorsement was before the control verse and he has utilized his platform to advertise his distaste for the g--- culture and how it has hurt so many.

    Secondly, Nike Cortez's are Nike sneakers which are far more "desinger" than classic reebok. That he actually sell for under $100 dollars..

    Thirdly, I've noticed a trend on here to try to balance out the Kendrick praise with hate and its despicable. It's ok..he is the golden child, he is winning, he is the king right now...so it seems almost blasphemous to go against him..So by doing so you think you are actually being fair and balanced but you are actually not

    Whether you like it or not, this will do nothing to alter Kendrick's message and it won't taint his image where his word will be question when the next classic comes around. It's crazy how you have a artist like Dot (And Cole and others). That's not in the news for bs and Section 80 for some reason is trying to be politically correct....
     
    #1
    0 0
    Jun 18, 2025
  2. LoveGame
    Posts: 477
    Likes: 775
    Joined: Dec 16, 2014
    Location: Liverpool

    LoveGame Love Game

    Jan 28, 2016
    I literally have no idea what your point is or what your thread is trying to say you went from Kendricks album and control verse to Kendrick releasing sneakers to section eighth being politically correct
     
    Jun 18, 2025
  3. Chigzzer
    Posts: 2,398
    Likes: 3,795
    Joined: Mar 15, 2015
    Location: London

    Chigzzer Man's on that grind

    Jan 28, 2016
     
    #3
    0 0
    Jun 18, 2025
  4. TheLegend
    Posts: 22
    Likes: 8
    Joined: Mar 13, 2015
    Location: Charlotte, NC

    Jan 28, 2016
    read the article on the site page..
     
    #4
    0 0
    Jun 18, 2025
  5. Immy
    Posts: 27,592
    Likes: 46,759
    Joined: Jul 26, 2015

    Immy yikes

    Jan 28, 2016
    link me
     
    #5
    1
    Music likes this.
    1
    Music likes this.
    Jun 18, 2025
  6. Charlie Work
    Posts: 14,879
    Likes: 25,807
    Joined: Nov 28, 2014

    Charlie Work Level 5 Goblin

    Jan 28, 2016
    [​IMG]
     
    #6
    0 0
    Jun 18, 2025
  7. zeerax
    Posts: 670
    Likes: 774
    Joined: Jan 23, 2016

    Jan 28, 2016
    This is not a big deal but the author definitely didn't do his homework... he clearly doesn't know what hes talking about.

    1) This isn't controversial, I haven't seen anybody talking about it.
    2) Like you said, this isn't his first deal with designers.
    3) Kendrick often uses that platform to earn money just to give it back to his city & those who really need it, thats one of the reasons why hes getting the key of Compton
    4) Quoting his control verse was pretty much useless... Kendrick himself said he was just having fun since the song was never supposed to see the light of the day.
    Kendrick was having fun freestyling over an unreleased beat and sean decided to release the song (good promo for his album I guess) and the entire article seems to be based on that.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2016
    #7
    1
    Besky likes this.
    1
    Besky likes this.
    Jun 18, 2025
  8. Music
    Posts: 4,040
    Likes: 4,184
    Joined: Jul 6, 2015

    Jan 29, 2016
     
    #8
    0 0
    Jun 18, 2025
  9. Lucy
    Posts: 28,738
    Likes: 62,057
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014

    Lucy #1

    Jan 29, 2016
    Reebok are s--- shoes lmao, who the f--- wears those k-mart tier shoes????
     
    #9
    0 0
    Jun 18, 2025
  10. Besky
    Posts: 3,207
    Likes: 3,008
    Joined: Dec 1, 2014

    Jan 30, 2016
    reebok :sweatt:
     
    #10
    0 0
    Jun 18, 2025